Why Media Companies Can Learn from the Likes of BMW: Q&A with Alan South

Alan South talks about the move from the physical to combined physical/digital world and what it means from an innovation perspective.

Alan South delivers learning programmes for senior executives and specializes in the field of innovation and entrepreneurship. He is on the faculty for FIPP and University of Oxford’s Saïd Business School’s Executive Programme for Innovation and Change (EPIC) for senior executive media leaders. He will present an Innovation deep-dive – Understanding innovation in a disrupted industry: What, how and when – at the Digital Innovators’ Summit (DIS) in Berlin, Germany on 24 March 2015.

At the DIS, participants in Alan’s deep-dive session will have the chance to directly engage in an intimate, highly interactive session with one of the leading innovation thinkers and practitioners in the world, someone with a thirty-year career in bringing ideas to life.

In the following interview that FIPP conducted with Alan, he talks about Bain & Co.’s view that media is the most impacted industry by the move from the physical to combined physical/digital world and what it means from an innovation perspective. He shares which companies he holds in high esteem as innovators. And, as someone with the unique perspective of looking in from the outside, he talks about what he admires about legacy media businesses and also where they might be going wrong. There is an over-riding message throughout as well, and that is no matter the industry you are in, there are certain universal innovation practices that should be applied in the process of future-proofing your business.

First, tell us a little more about yourself?

I have a thirty-year career bringing new ideas to life. At the start it was about the arrival of computers, and specifically single chip microprocessors, that was driving change. Then along came this thing called the internet. I made a presentation at a conference explaining how our homes would have connections to water, gas, electricity – and information. I recall a response of polite indulgence to humour me without being rude. More recently, I have been in the renewable energy industry during its journey from “that will never work” to mainstream investment class. Having witnessed so much change, I become ever more convinced of the truth in the saying: "People overestimate what they can accomplish in a year and they underestimate what they can do in ten".

Bain & Co mentions media as the most impacted by the transition from a physical world to a combined digital/physical world. How should media companies adapt to this transition?

There is one over-riding message I’d like to share. It applies for any form of innovation, or for any new technology, and most certainly for a transition to a more digital world. Apply the same rigorous management discipline to any new experiments or ventures into digital as you would do to anything else in business. I see all too commonly an approach to fall in love with a (digital) idea, place a bet, and hope it turns into money. This would not be acceptable elsewhere in business and there is no reason why it should be so in digital. There is a poor track record of companies surviving a major industry disruption of this sort. The best course of action is to load things in your favour by adopting a disciplined approach.

Innovate or die. But innovation is mostly not one single bright idea, and there are different types of innovation. Thoughts?

All companies need to innovate and renew themselves at least as fast as the outside world is changing. Competition and commoditisation drive down margins, and once attractive offers become obsolete. Your question therefore, applies to all businesses: innovate, or fade away. However, your choice of dramatic language – “innovate or die” - applies specifically to an industry where there is rapid and disruptive change. The concept of the “one big idea” is compelling, especially when times are challenging, but the problem is that it almost never works! When times are tough, rather than seeking the one big idea, the correct response is to increase the rate of taking innovations to market. In this respect, we can all learn a lot from the digital world about increasing innovation rate. In fact, this is very much the principle of the second of the two innovation processes we will be exploring in my session at DIS: how we can learn from the digital world to increase the innovation tempo and the innovation hit rate. Finally, there are indeed many forms of innovation, and a core component of my full masterclass develops this concept and surprises the participants with the breadth of opportunities.

Any thoughts on what the (legacy) media industry is doing wrong? And right?

My impression is that within the traditional media business there is a natural, human, tendency not to cut legacy costs perhaps as fast as they should be cut. I know and respect that this is easy to say and very hard to do. In terms of doing things right, I see an incredible ability of magazine media businesses to connect with and to inspire their audience. Such a level of connection to the customer is something other industries only aspire to and I often wonder how this might be monetised. It is important to emphasise that my involvement with the media industry is only from the periphery, so these points are impressions rather than fully informed opinion.

Which companies impress you with their approach to innovation?

I am always impressed by companies that relentlessly think of the mid to long term and innovate through good times and bad. The results build up in layers to the point where an unassailable position is established. Good examples would be the German or the Japanese automotive companies. I like to single out BMW. Being relatively small by the global scale by which such companies are viewed, their R&D spend in absolute terms is far from the highest. However, when you drive their cars you get the impression they have spent the most on R&D. Also, in terms of major disruption, they are leading the way with the move to electrification and have recently gone public with the statement “We believe that BMW will likely phase out internal combustion engines over the next 10 years”. Relentless layering of innovation should not be interpreted as incremental or dull. It puts a company into a position of great innovation health and able to tackle the big disruptions.

 

Come join Alan and us at the Digital Innovators' Summit in Berlin from 23-24 March 2015!